Showing posts with label E. Bestpitch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label E. Bestpitch. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

Woman Empowered (as consumers and comodities)


By E. Bestpitch

“The paramount obligation of a college is to develop in its students the ability to think clearly and independently, and the ability to live confidently, courageously, and hopefully.”*
Ellen Browning Scripps

The mission of Scripps College is to educate women to develop their intellects and talents through active participation in a community of scholars, so that as graduates they may contribute to society through public and private lives of leadership, service, integrity, and creativity.

The smells, sounds and sights of my alma mater are not yet unfamiliar to me. Only six months ago I was preparing for my departure from Scripps College, and a short two years before that I lived in this very dorm, Kimberly.

The Resident Advisors’ rooms are in still in the same spot, the familiar television room houses the same hotel lobby-looking furniture, and students’ doors are still plastered with pictures, stickers, and notes from friends. Nothing seems to have changed much at all since I left, with the exception of the wall decorations that the peer mentors** put up every year.

The year I lived in Kimbo, laserjet print-outs of classic Peanuts characters were plastered on the walls. We each got one character on our door, next to our name. My last year in school I lived in an ocean-themed dorm—construction paper cutouts of sand castles, beach balls, sea horses and fish lined our halls. Other themes which were considerably less tolerable included fairytale fantasies, replete with princesses flouting long hair, flowing dresses, and the signature helplessness that compels an inevitable heterosexual storybook coupling of a schlub-turned-dragon-slayer and a helpless heiress to unfathomable fortune.

Since I chose not to take part in the peer mentor program, I had no say in the decorating and thus did not complain. But as I recently traversed the halls of the school that granted me my Bachelor’s degree in Sociology, I could not help but fume over the colorful cutouts decorating my much-loved Kimbo. The images in the halls shocked and bewildered me for a moment, then angered me. Upon approaching the front hallway in this Vegas-themed dorm, I noticed cutouts of Prada and Gucci purses, shopping bags, a Visa Black credit card, novelty-sized diamond rings, and ornate high-heeled shoes.

Women are consistently depicted in commercial advertising as consumers, unrelenting in their attachment to products (the slogan “diamonds are forever” comes to mind), and also as the consumed—often as the reward for a (heterosexual) male using or purchasing a specific product. (Think of Axe body product commercials, wherein Axe users are depicted as literal magnets for females.)

Females are seen as both primary consumers as mothers and keepers of the house, as well as commodities in and of themselves. While these roles may seem contradictory, the fact remains: advertisers target females in their ads, playing upon traditional gender roles of women as caretakers while simultaneously attracting males to consumerism by depicting women as commodities to be possessed. Walking through Kimbo and seeing reproductions of advertisements that encourage a life of consumerism for the sake of being a commodity did not sit well with me. It bothered me not only from the perspective of gender but also of class.

It would be one thing to post construction-paper cutouts of the Target logo, Payless shoes, and cubic zirconium rings. But Prada and Gucci represent a consumer market that is limited to an upper-middle class status to which many students do not belong, and to which many do not aspire, myself included. For a school that boasts diversity, the dorm decorations chosen by peer mentors certainly alienate students who cannot and/or do not relate to upper-class consumerism. And as a school that extols the importance of female empowerment I have to wonder at the implicitly sexist quasi-advertising of high heels, Prada, Gucci, and diamonds—things that females consume in order to become more valuable commodities.

The mission of Scripps College is to breed a sense of integrity, creativity, compassion and thoughtfulness in our lives. Kimbo’s Vegas-themed decorations--staring students in the face every day—encourage an unequal and thoughtless brand of capitalism and promote a sense of materialism that lacks any creativity or compassion. While some students may recognize that this display is an undeserved lauding of vacuous consumerism, I undoubtedly believe that this re-creation of media-touted models of consumer and class practices comes from the subconscious consumer voice that commercials, billboards, and Hollywood have worked so hard to fuel within us. That scares me.

Funny how walking down a hallway that flaunted such richesse could make me feel so cheap.

*Scripps College mission statement, as laid out in their college catalogue.
** peer mentors are students who assume middle-management positions between other students and the resident advisors. Ostensibly their duties include resolving dorm conflict, counseling first year students as needed, and planning dorm-wide or school-wide events.

References
Female as consumer/commodity advertising images: http://www.ltcconline.net/lukas/gender/pages/consume.htm

A video depicting the female consumer:
http://ia300120.us.archive.org/1/items/Consumin1967/Consumin1967.mpg

A discussion of women as consumers and their consumer role in the economy:
http://www.unpac.ca/economy/consumers.html

For more information:
Leading author and lecturer on advertising and its effect on women as consumers and commodities
http://www.jeankilbourne.com/index.html

An article on female empowerment, consumerism, and the “metrosexual” phenomenon
http://hedonisticpleasureseeker.wordpress.com/2006/11/05/in-which-the-hedonistic-pleasureseeker-muses-on-female-empowerment-metrosexuals-and-consumer-culture/

Sunday, October 29, 2006

Room for Everyone: a Critique of Gender Binary Language

By E. Bestpitch

Historically, the universal person was always a "he" or "man." We read books to learn about mankind. Doctors, lawyers, technicians were referred to in textbooks and manuals as "he," whether females participated in these occupations or not. In fact, grammarians considered it incorrect to use anything but the "he" pronoun when referring to all of humankind, or a type of person generally. In the ‘60s, feminists advocated the use of gender-specific pronouns in order to increase fairness to women by acknowledging their role in historical and contemporary times. Since then, a politically driven reform to the English language mandated that the pronouns "he" and "she" would be used to refer to a specific gendered body, rather than having “he” refer to all gendered bodies. This is generally known as "gender fair" language.

While this language may be fair to those who identify as “she” and “he” by acknowledging both for their important roles in our society, the problem with these pronouns is exactly that: that they only recognize two types of people in our society—“he” and “she.” There are more than two kinds of gendered bodies. Yes, there are men and there are women. And there are genderqueers, genderfucks, androgynous people and many, many others who do not fully identify with “man/he” or “woman/she.” These are the folks who are now being ignored—disavowed from society through our binary language system. As a feminist, I fully support the goal that women be included in language and literature in order to recognize their achievements and contributions to our society. As a queer person, I am dismayed that people of all gendered expressions and identities are not being appropriately represented in text and everyday speech. This is why I advocate for the use of gender-neutral pronouns in our everyday lives.

Gender-neutrality in pronoun usage assures that people of all genders are being represented as we talk about people and humans in general. Using a gender-neutral pronoun (a popular one and my personal favorite is "zie," pronounced “zee”) not only eliminates a dominant gender (such as “he”) in language, but also prevents us from making assumptions about people’s gender identity without having asked. When was the last time you asked your friends what their preferred pronouns are?

To be truly fair to all of the variations of gendered bodies, gendered expressions, and gendered people, we must push our language further not only to include the socially constructed ideas of "man" and "woman", "he" and "she", but also to include all forms of gender expression in everyday language. The current dialogue around gender-neutral pronouns is generally used as one method to combat sexism in our patriarchal society. But all of the resources I have seen regarding gender-neutral pronouns avoid any discussion of a continuum of gendered expressions that cannot always be accurately described as "he" or "she.” Using gender-neutral language in everyday speech shifts the paradigm from gender binaries (s/he) to gender fluidities and allows for a wider range of genders to be respected and acknowledged in society.

In my quest for this "zie" revolution, I have come up against a slew of arguments, one in particular being that some want to be recognized by a specific gendered pronoun in order to associate with a social identity—a political, historical, and economical context—that adds meaning to their lives. I am certainly not trying to dissolve anybody’s personal identity; in fact, quite the opposite is true. I envision a society in which a person may be associated with a social group or identity of their choosing, rather than one in which a person is grouped with others based on assumptions about their personality, their look, their actions, their physical attributes. I, for one, am interested in being considered by more than the gendered pronoun that has been assigned to me at birth by the virtue of my genitalia, and I stand in solidarity with all the genderqueers, genderfucks, transfolk, and everyone and anyone else who does not fit in with societies traditional ideas of gender and sex by using gender-neutral pronouns.




RESOURCES

for more information on gender-neutral pronouns and their variations, check out wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-neutral_pronouns

for info on the history of gender-neutral pronouns, gender expression and language, and other resources, check these out:
http://www.rpi.edu/web/writingcenter/genderfair.html
Gender "fair" language

http://www.bartleby.com/64/5.html
American Heritage Book of English Usage: Gender

http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/language_gender,2.html
Women and language—social expression